Thursday, January 21, 2010

Dampening expectations

I felt the need earlier this week when I saw this editorial in the Belleville Intelligencer to start dampening expectations that newly appointed Education Minister Leona Dombrowsky is going to play the role of the rural-school champion. From the piece:
One issue we hope Dombrowsky adds to that is rural school closings. A major platform plank of the Liberals in 2003, the government has had only limited success in keeping smaller rural schools open. In 2009, about 150 schools were closing or were recommended to be closed while about 100 more were undergoing accommodation reviews.
As recently as last September, Dombrowsky was non-committal on the issue, saying "Our government has recognized that in small communities (schools are) a community hub. We also have to acknowledge that the very purpose of schools is to educate children. The school must be able to provide the best programming. A school needs a critical mass to do that. It's about balancing (those needs.)"
As the minister now responsible for balancing those needs, we hope Dombrowsky uses her experience not only as minister for rural affairs but as a self proclaimed "rural member" to tip that balance away from protecting the bottom line at all costs and toward protecting rural communities that rely so heavily on their schools for more than just educating their children.
Well, here's the thing: Some of this may be boosterism since Dombrowsky is the local MPP for the Belleville and the rural areas to the north and south. Out my way, in the heart of Ontario's agricultural region, Dombroswky — to be fair, the Liberal government as a whole — wasn't seen as a hero when I was covering that beat. Admittedly, this part of Ontario is more Tory blue in its traditions than Liberal red, particularly out on the concession roads, but she didn't have an easy ride as minister. While the government did eventually adopt a Risk Management Program-style initiative, the province's general farm organizations did an end-run around Dombrowsky to then-finance minister Greg Sorbara to get support for the program. I have, in a drawer around here somewhere, the 300+ pages to prove it that led to my own feature-length series.
Suffice it to say that despite her background, her reputation within the farm community isn't sterling.
Making the assumption that because of her experience as Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs minister she will do any more or any better at 'protecting' rural schools is a big leap of faith. This government has been particularly consistent in insisting it's the district school board's responsibility to decide what school facilities it will operate and where it will operate them. I don't see that changing under Dombrowsky's tenure. In fact, she's a proven communicator in maintaining the government's message.
Will the still-to-be-finalized policy on the sharing of school board facilities have a more rural flavour to it as a result of Dombrowsky? Possibly.
Will she be a friendlier ear to the Community Schools Alliance — one who engages their requests and delivers on them — than her predecessor? Doubtful.
We shouldn't expect Dombrowsky will relieve boards of their responsibility to review, vet and give fulsome consideration to the location, size and condition of the spaces our children are learning in— regardless of whether they're on a rural concession or an urban throughfare.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

ER,

I share your skepticism. I'm pretty sure that McGuinty will keep a tight rein on Dombrowsky, just as he did with his former ed. ministers. It's been rumoured that Dalton takes a very hands-on interest in this Ministry.

Perhaps with Bill 177 in the can the government feels it can rest on those laurels and appease the small towns and rural communities?

I can tell you from speaking with some of my farming friends in my neighbourhood replacing Dombrowsky with Mitchell is an improvement, but not much of one.

CC

RetDir said...

Of course she won't "relieve boards of their responsibility to review, vet and give fulsome consideration to the location, size and condition of the spaces our children are learning in— regardless of whether they're on a rural concession or an urban throughfare." Indeed, since that is now one of the few significant decisions school boards make, one for which the provincial politicians don't wish to take responsibility, and that the education budget will be squeezed everywhere outside of salaries, chance are good that school closures and consolidations will continue to occur, and the pace may even quicken. The DM was musing out loud last week about the need for co-terminous boards to share space in both existing and new buildings, and for boards to share space in schools with other organizations and agencies. A few examples exist, but not usually fully collaborative ones (two schools joined by a library or gym, or a daycare nestled up against one side of a school), so it will be interesting to see what happens in this regard.

Anonymous said...

"The DM was musing out loud last week about the need for co-terminous boards to share space in schools with other organizations and agencies."

Great, let's give the DM a cookie!

What exactly does the MOT think small co-terminous boards have been doing out of necessity for years?

That the DM would publicly muse like that just tells me that there'aint no money coming to boards near you any time soon to pay for the programs that read very nicely on paper and prop. up handy photo-ops, but support the boards charged with their implementation? Nope...sorry...find you're own way out of that mess boards and while you're at it if the kids don't meet provincial standard it's all your fault!!

What's not to like?

CC

Education Reporter said...

RetDir / CC:

Interesting points— you're both right. Some boards do co-operate well without instruction. Others don't however, almost vehemently in some cases. They need to be specifically told, so it'll be interesting to see when the policy comes out.

As to Dombrowsky, I was speaking with a government employee (who will remain anonymous for various reasons) from another ministry who agreed completely with my assessment of how the new education minister was perceived in rural areas under ag.

Hugo